The People's Awareness Coalition Forum
NOTICE: As of 2012 this forum is no longer active
• Visit our new
Open Forum
, please
click here
Page LogOn Time : • Greetings, concerned American. Note most topics reserved for members only. We welcome you to
Register
.
Home
Events
Search
Help
Login
Register
Not My Government | Forum
› Send an alert to Board Moderator about this post
Posting Entry
Send an alert to Board Moderator about this post
(
Please specify issue in your submission
)
Subject:
Name:
Email:
Verification Code is:
Below, type exactly what
text appears in the image.
Case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview:
Live Preview
Live Preview
Message:
You must enable JavaScript to get full functionality for this forum!
For expanded HTML Formatting, Click Here.
Verdana
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-
Arial
Verdana
MS Sans Serif
Times New Roman
Lucida Sans
Tahoma
Georgia
Courier
11
----
10
11
12
14
[quote author=4B46504A4649270 link=1315751958/1#1 date=1315752655][size=14][color=#cc0000][b]Some more insight to where that quote came from and what it is about...[/b][/color][/size] In September of 2011 I had accidently found some additional information on the DOJ quote, which provides some interesting missing pieces of the puzzle. This was taken from a speech made by Janet Reno in 2001: [list]"There is, on the wall of the 9th Street gate, a saying that I have come to rely on again and again. It says, [i]"The common law derives from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the light of reason."[/i] Unless the law issues from all of the people, some of the people will feel left out. They will come to feel alienated. They will be angry. And this will not be a cohesive democracy. If you don't care about that, they will feel left out, alienated, and they will not have the opportunities that others have to skills, to jobs, to opportunity. That will only hurt America." [url=http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2001/11501portraitunveiling.htm]Source[/url] [/list]The part left out of the header of the DOJ site: "...framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the [u]li[/u]g[u]ht[/u] of reason." Wow, [i]"framed" by mutual confidence[/i]? and [i]"sanctioned" by the light of reason[/i]? [list][b]frame[/b] 1. To build by putting together the structural parts of; construct: frame a house. 2. To conceive or design: framed an alternate proposal. 3. To arrange or adjust for a purpose: The question was framed to draw only one answer. 4. a. To put into words; formulate: frame a reply. b. To form (words) silently with the lips. 5. To enclose in or as if in a frame. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/frame [b]sanc·tion[/b] 1. Authoritative permission or approval that makes a course of action valid. See Synonyms at permission. 2. Support or encouragement, as from public opinion or established custom. 3. A consideration, influence, or principle that dictates an ethical choice. 4. a. A law or decree. b. The penalty for noncompliance specified in a law or decree. 5. A penalty, specified or in the form of moral pressure, that acts to ensure compliance or conformity. 6. A coercive measure adopted usually by several nations acting together against a nation violating int. law. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sanctioned [/list]Well, that sounds like Masonic lingo to me (the full quote, that is). What Janet Reno stated is also a bunch of socialist bullshit that is in line with the New World Order's plan of World Communism. Remember, socialist minds act in unison in their understanding that they know better than you, [i]i.e.[/i], framed by mutual confidence : [url=http://www.pacgroups.us/eletter/post/NL_0511.php]The Socialist Mind[/url] The [i]Common Law[/i] comes from custom and usage... ERGO, it comes naturally; there is nothing "framed" about it. The Masons (architects of "light (illumination)", but in actuality of the darkness) [i]frame[/i] things. The [i]Private Law[/i] is "framed" by the will of legislatures; such are the minions of Masons framing things by their mutual confidence, [i]i.e.[/i], believing in their "assignment". The [i]private law[/i] is what Americans have had "sanctioned" on them the past 140 years by the legislatures (states/federal). Americans have not had the pleasure of common law societies, which is derived from the customs and usages of a people. My analysis was right on point... Again, see the paper, [url=http://www.pacinlaw.us/doj/]Department of Justice and Its Common Law[/url][/quote]
Max 12000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size:
px
Collapse/Expand additional features, Click Here.
Disable Smilies:
Check this if you'll be adding code (or don't like smilies).
Enable auto-copy Message:
Check this if you want the message auto-copied to your clipboard before Post or Preview.
Forum Jump »
Home
» 25 most recent Posts
» 15 most recent Topics
Visitor Information
- Welcome to the Not My Government Forum
- The Not My Government Polls
- Hello NMG Visitors
PAC Alliance Program
- Welcome to The PAC Alliance Program
- Help the Coalition Heal Our Republics
- Suggestions for PAC Alliance Program
Our Members
PAC Groups Education
- PAC Educational Group
- Events for PAC Groups
State Nationals Society
- State Nationals Introduction
Island Makers Project
- Welcome to Island Makers Project
The Discussion Board
- Members General Discussion
Republic vs. Democracy
- Two Parties with One Face
- Nothing Happens by Accident ««
- The Conspiracy Corner
Insurgency Agents
- Enemies of The Republic
- Wolves in Sheeps Clothing
- People Dividing the Movement
Top of Page
Not My Government | Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.4
.
YaBB
© 2000-2011. All Rights Reserved.
Site Born: November 2008
contact
Join PAC Talk
Conference Calls
I need to know more about PAC...
Community
Tour Page
Next Level
I would like to get started with PAC...
Start Now
Enrollment
Assist Us